Gender-Affirming Care and Employer Health Benefits
New York City Lawyers Asserting the Rights of Transgender Employees
Historically, American health insurance plans contained broad exclusions that prohibited payment for services related to transgender care, transsexualism, sex change treatments, and gender identity disorders. Sometimes doctors themselves interpreted these exclusions to assume that transgender people could not get coverage for their medical care. As a result of these and other biases in health care, many transgender individuals avoided doctors. However, as of 2015, more employers offer transgender-inclusive health benefits plans. The New York City Human Rights Law prohibits employers from discriminating against transgender employees by failing to provide equal benefits with regard to gender-affirming care and employer health benefits. The New York City transgender discrimination attorneys at Phillips & Associates can help workers explore their options if they believe that they have suffered from inappropriate treatment on the job.
Gender-Affirming Care and Employer Health Benefits
Title VII and the New York Human Rights Law provide protection to employees who are transgender or gender nonconforming. However, the most explicit protections are provided under the New York City Human Rights Law, and in most cases, it is better to seek remedies under this law, rather than Title VII or the state law. Title VII only applies to employers with 15 or more employees and does not explicitly protect transgender or gender nonconforming individuals with regard to health benefits. Moreover, damages are capped.
Under the New York City Human Rights Law, employers in the city may not offer their employees benefits that discriminate, deny, or exclude services based on gender. Employees are to be offered benefits equally, regardless of gender, gender identity, or gender expression. Generally, if your benefit plan is covered by and complies with ERISA and other federal anti-discrimination laws, it will also be legal under the New York City Human Rights Law.
Know Your Rights Regarding Your Health Plan
In order to be considered nondiscriminatory with regard to gender, your benefits are supposed to cover gender-affirming care, which is also known as transition-related care or transgender care. Gender-affirming care is life-saving and medically necessary, and it may include many different types of treatment, including surgery, voice training, and hormone replacement therapy. What an individual is likely to want depends on their own needs. Both New York State law and the Affordable Care Act require self-insured plans to cover medically necessary transition-related care. However, certain insurance plans completely exclude transgender care.
An employer is not held responsible if the insurer denies coverage of a particular medical procedure, such as sexual re-assignment surgery, even if the plan itself claims that it will provide gender-affirming care coverage. In these cases, you will need to seek relief against the insurer. A violation of the New York City Human Rights Law might involve, for example, an employer that offers health benefits to opposite-sex spouses of employees but not a transgender spouse. Another violation might be when health benefits do not cover care when an individual's sex assigned at birth is different from one in which a particular health service is ordinarily available, such as benefits available for breast cancer screening for cisgender women but not transgender women. Another violation might be an employer offering insurance that provides a categorical exclusion for health services related to transition.
Damages and Other Remedies
Damages may be available to an employee who experiences discrimination with regard to benefits because they are gender nonconforming or transgender. In some cases, an employee does try to exercise protected rights with regard to benefits and suffers from retaliation. Retaliation is prohibited under the New York City Human Rights Law. In some cases, an employee may be incorrect about the discrimination but believes in good faith that discrimination has occurred. In such cases, an employer that tries to punish an employee for exercising rights in good faith may be retaliating against the employee, and the employee may be able to recover damages for retaliation.
Remedies may include compensatory damages, such as emotional distress and mental anguish, as well as back pay, front pay, and reinstatement. These are not capped if you bring a civil lawsuit. If you file an administrative claim, the Commission may penalize employers with up to $125,000 for violations and up to $250,000 for willful, wanton, or malicious violations.
Seek Guidance from a Gender Identity Discrimination Lawyer in New York City
The New York City Human Rights Law is considered one of the most protective laws in the nation for transgender and gender nonconforming individuals. Transgender people should be able to get the care that they need, and this law ensures that they are not denied medical coverage when their cisgender coworkers are able to access it. Gender-affirming care and employer health benefits must be available to transgender employees if workplace health benefits are provided to employees generally. At Phillips & Associates, our New York City attorneys can advise clients on filing internal complaints of gender expression discrimination, and we can bring a charge or lawsuit afterward if appropriate. Contact us online or at (866) 229-9441 to set up a free appointment with a gender identity discrimination attorney. We fight employment discrimination in the Bronx, Queens, Brooklyn, Staten Island, and Manhattan, as well as in Westchester, Nassau, and Suffolk Counties and in New Jersey.
PHILLIPS & ASSOCIATES
45
Broadway, #430
New York, NY 10006
Tel: (866) 229-9441
Fax: (212) 901-2107
Discrimination Lawyer Success
MORE THAN $250 MILLION RECOVERED FOR PAST CLIENTS
-
$1.8 Million Race Discrimination
Won a substantial $1.8 million verdict in the Southern District of New York for John Pardovani, with $800,000 in compensatory damages and $1,000,000 in punitive damages. This result was led by Jesse S. Weinstein and Gregory W. Kirschenbaum.
-
$2.2 Million Race Discrimination & Retaliation
Secured a landmark $2.2 million verdict in Rosas v. Balter Sales, et al., affirming justice for race discrimination and retaliation in 2015. Led by Greg Kirschenbaum.
-
$1.4 Million Religious & Sexual Orientation Discrimination
Achieved a groundbreaking $1.4 million verdict in 2012 for a chef facing religious and sexual orientation discrimination, marking the highest employment law verdict of the year. Bryan Arce was instrumental in this win.
-
$280 Thousand Race Discrimination
Secured a pivotal ruling in New York where a federal jury declared that the use of the N-word in the workplace is never acceptable, reinforcing workplace equality and respect.